Drip, drip...
The Sunday Times - Times Online (UK) reports:
<aside>BTW, since when did the definition of "use of military force" not include routine bombing?</aside>
So, now it appears even more clear that the war criminals didn't bother to wait for congressional authorization.
THE RAF and US aircraft doubled the rate at which they were dropping bombs on Iraq in 2002 in an attempt to provoke Saddam Hussein into giving the allies an excuse for war, new evidence has shown.This ought to get interesting.
The attacks were intensified from May, six months before the United Nations resolution that Tony Blair and Lord Goldsmith, the attorney-general, argued gave the coalition the legal basis for war. By the end of August the raids had become a full air offensive.
[...]
The Ministry of Defence figures, provided in response to a question from Sir Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, show that despite the lack of an Iraqi reaction, the air war began anyway in September with a 100-plane raid.
The systematic targeting of Iraqi air defences appears to contradict Foreign Office legal guidance appended to the leaked briefing paper which said that the allied aircraft were only “entitled to use force in self-defence where such a use of force is a necessary and proportionate response to actual or imminent attack from Iraqi ground systems”.
<aside>BTW, since when did the definition of "use of military force" not include routine bombing?</aside>
So, now it appears even more clear that the war criminals didn't bother to wait for congressional authorization.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home