I'm shocked! (again)

Abu Ghraib Tactics Were First Used at Guantanamo:

Interrogators at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, forced a stubborn detainee to wear women's underwear on his head, confronted him with snarling military working dogs and attached a leash to his chains, according to a newly released military investigation that shows the tactics were employed there months before military police used them on detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

The techniques, approved by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld for use in interrogating Mohamed Qahtani -- the alleged '20th hijacker' in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks -- were used at Guantanamo Bay in late 2002 as part of a special interrogation plan aimed at breaking down the silent detainee.

Military investigators who briefed the Senate Armed Services Committee yesterday on the three-month probe, called the tactics 'creative' and 'aggressive' but said they did not cross the line into torture.

The report's findings are the strongest indication yet that the abusive practices seen in photographs at Abu Ghraib were not the invention of a small group of thrill-seeking military police officers. The report shows that they were used on Qahtani several months before the United States invaded Iraq.

The investigation also supports the idea that soldiers believed that placing hoods on detainees, forcing them to appear nude in front of women and sexually humiliating them were approved interrogation techniques for use on detainees.

A central figure in the investigation, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, who commanded the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay and later helped set up U.S. operations at Abu Ghraib, was accused of failing to properly supervise Qahtani's interrogation plan and was recommended for reprimand by investigators. Miller would have been the highest-ranking officer to face discipline for detainee abuses so far, but Gen. Bantz Craddock, head of the U.S. Southern Command, declined to follow the recommendation.

Well, duh! Any idiot could have figured out that rubes from West Virginia, including one with a learning disability, couldn't have come up on their own with the interrogation tactics that were the subject of the Abu Ghraib photos. I made this point back in December. Yet further evidence that nothing said by this administration is to be believed. Nothing.

The thing that really pisses me off though is that the article does not bother to call the administration on its previous lies that the abuse at Abu Ghraib was just the actions of a small handfull of rogue MPs. Nothing could be further from the truth. Frankly, until the MSM regrows its spine and starts calling the administration on its lies, the American public (or at least the 41% who still believe that Bush is "honest and straightforward") will continue to be mislead and misinformed about the worst. administration. ever.