Who?!
Harriet Miers? Someone who has never served as a judge?
There's no one more qualified than she?
She may be a fine attourney, who knows. Certainly, because she has been serving as Bush's counsel, we'll never know what her views are, and have access to precious little of her writings.
What ever happened to the notion that being nominated to serve on the highest court in the land usually meant that you had earned that distinction and that there was no doubt as to your qualifications.
BushCo cronyism continues at its breathtaking pace.
There's no one more qualified than she?
She may be a fine attourney, who knows. Certainly, because she has been serving as Bush's counsel, we'll never know what her views are, and have access to precious little of her writings.
What ever happened to the notion that being nominated to serve on the highest court in the land usually meant that you had earned that distinction and that there was no doubt as to your qualifications.
BushCo cronyism continues at its breathtaking pace.
1 Comments:
I'm not to sure about his choice either ... but I have been told that it actually is not unusual to have non-judges nominated and confirmed to the supreme court.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/b/a/207605.htm
By Anonymous, at October 07, 2005 10:01 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home